Had a great long discussion (more like a debate) in Film today because as hypocritical as I am about the subject (I eat meat so can't really speak much about it) but the slaughter of animals for entertainment purposes is beyond me. People kept saying that the slaughter would happen anyway due to the animals being bred for eating, but yet the director's bought these animals and instead of saving them and letting them live, they then kill them. It seems pointless and a waste of a life. Then you have the added thing of, if an animal is allowed to be taken off of deathrow and used in films, can a convict in the same situation be taken and used in a film whilst getting killed. Controversial much?!?
Anyway guys, I have to go finish reading my book for English tomorrow so I shall speak more later. Thanks =)
No comments:
Post a Comment